I have a question regarding a recent edit by AwesoMan3000  and the revert by Codeholic .
A rake is defined as "a puffer whose debris consists of spaceships". By that definition, Pufferfish is not a rake, as can be seen by clicking "View animated image".
However, the page notes that there are Pufferfish-derived patterns that are rakes.
- Was the revert based on the fact that there are Pufferfish-derived rakes as stated on that page?
- If so, what is the policy on placing categories based on derivative patterns, for which the category does not apply to the original pattern?
FractalFusion (talk) 08:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- There is no policy regarding that besides common sense. Codeholic (talk) 17:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)