bubblegum wrote: ↑June 12th, 2020, 4:12 pm
Stuck on H-on-H #4.
My usual method in these cases is to post something so awful that somebody won't be able to resist improving it. Repeat time 481:
Code: Select all
x = 380, y = 76, rule = LifeHistory
328.A3.2A$326.3A3.A$325.A3.2A.A$324.A2.A.A.A$324.A.2ABAB$325.A2.2BA$
326.3ABA$323.3A2.BA$323.A2.3A5B$326.A2.6B$324.A.A2.7B6.2A$324.2A3.6BA
B5.A$328.6BABA2.BA.A19.2A$292.2A34.6B2A2B.B2A19.B2A2B3.2A$292.A35.12B
22.4B2.B2AB$283.3B3.BA.A35.12B18.B.6B3.2B$283.3BDB.B2A36.12B8.A7.10B
2.2B$5.2C235.6C35.2BDBD2B36.2AB.9B9.3A5.11B2A2B$.4C.2C233.C5.C35.BD2B
D2B35.A.AB.10B11.A3.12B2A3B.B$.6C240.C35.2B2D3B35.A4.3B2A6B9.2A3.18B
2A$2.4C235.C4.C36.6B35.2A5.BABA7B8.4B2.15B.B2A$243.2C38.4B43.3BA9B9.
18B3.B$330.9B.4B8.18B$242.2C84.2D6B.B.6B.2B2.19B$.4C235.C4.C80.D.3BD
37B$6C240.C81.4BD27B.7B$4C.2C233.C5.C79.D5BD27B2.6B$4.2C235.6C27.B52.
6D28B.7B$273.4B49.36B.6B$272.4B52.11B.2B.9B7.9B$271.4B68.9B8.8B$270.
4B67.12B8.8B$257.2A10.4B67.14B8.7B8.A$258.A9.4B68.9B2.4B8.7B5.3A$256.
A10.4B63.2A2.13B.4B7.7B4.A$256.5A5.4B5.2A57.A2.5BA9B.4B5.8B4.2A$261.A
3.5B5.A55.2A.A.5BABA8B2.4B4.9B.4B$258.3AB2.7B.BA.A55.A2.3A.3BABA8B3.
4B2.13B$257.A.2B3.7B.B2A57.2A2.BA2B.BA11B2.4B3.12B$257.4A7B2D3B61.4A
2B3.3B3.2B.2A3.4B2.12B$255.2A2.BA3B2A2BDBD2B61.A.4B.7B4.A5.4B2.11B$
254.A2.3AB.2B2A2BD4B59.A.A.2A3.2A.B.2A5.3A3.4B4.7B$254.2A.A.B3.10B59.
2A2.A5.A3.A8.A4.4B2.8B$257.A8.8B62.A.A.A.A.A.A.A12.12B$257.2A7.9B62.
2A.2A.A.A.2A11.14B$267.3B2.4B67.A.A12.17B$265.5B3.4B66.A.A12.18B$265.
2A7.4B66.A13.18B$266.A8.4B80.17B$263.3A10.4B25.3B51.3B.B3.7B.B2A$263.
A13.4B23.4B51.2A2.2B3.6B.BA.A$278.3B22.4B53.A.B2AB3.B.2B5.A$279.2B.B
19.4B51.3A3.2A5.2B6.2A$282.2B6.A10.4B52.A11.B2AB$282.3B5.3A7.4B66.2A$
282.4B7.A5.4B$283.4B5.2A4.4B$284.4B4.9B$285.4B5.6B$286.4B2.3BD4B$287.
7BD7B$288.6B3D5B$289.13B$290.10B.B2A$291.4B2AB3.BA.A$292.3B2AB6.A$
294.4B6.2A$294.3B$291.AB.2B$290.A.AB2AB$290.A.ABABAB$287.2A.A.A.A.A2.
A$287.A2.A2.2A.4A$289.2A4.A$295.A.A$296.2A!
Along similar lines,
Goldtiger997's LifeWiki list has a red "No" under "eater" for
46P4H1V0, and that will never do.
The following has repeat time 885, which should be easy to beat, even with something that has a glider output (which would get rid of another red cell in that row of the table):
Code: Select all
x = 127, y = 321, rule = LifeHistory
92.2A$91.A.A$85.2A4.A$83.A2.A2.2A.4A$83.2A.A.A.A.A2.A$58.2A26.A.A.A.A
$57.A.A26.A.A.2A$51.2A4.A29.A$49.A2.A2.2A.4A$49.2A.A.A.A.A2.A38.2A$
52.A.A.A.A32.2A7.A$52.A.A.2A33.2A5.A.A$53.A44.2A2$66.2A22.3D$57.2A7.A
23.D$57.2A5.A.A24.D$64.2A2$56.3D29.2A$56.D32.A$57.D28.3A$86.A2$54.2A$
55.A$52.3A$52.A4$59.A$57.3A$56.A65.2A$55.A.A64.A$55.A.A66.A$56.A47.2A
14.5A$105.A13.A$105.A.A12.3A$106.2A15.A$111.2D7.4A$40.2A68.D.D2.2A3.A
3.2A$19.A20.2A70.D2.2A4.3A2.A$17.3A103.A.2A$16.A37.D68.A$15.A.A35.D
68.2A$15.A.A35.3D4.2A$16.A43.A.A$42.2A18.A51.2A$43.A9.2A7.2A50.A$42.A
10.2A60.3A$42.2A73.A$2A43.2A65.2A$2A40.2A.2A65.A$43.A66.A.A$41.A3.2A
63.2A$41.4A2.A58.A$20.2A22.A.A.A56.A.A$20.A.A18.2A.A2.A18.A38.A.A$2.
2A18.A19.A.A19.3A39.A$3.A9.2A7.2A17.A2.2A8.3D6.A$2.A10.2A26.A.A2.A.A
5.D8.2A53.2A$2.2A36.2A.2A2.2A4.3D62.A$5.2A109.A.A$2.2A.2A109.2A$3.A$.
A3.2A$.4A2.A87.2A$4.A.A.A70.2A15.A$.2A.A2.A18.A52.A16.A.A$2.A.A19.3A
50.A.A17.2A$.A2.2A8.3D6.A47.2A4.2A$.A.A2.A.A5.D8.2A46.2A$2A.2A2.2A4.
3D94.2A.A$110.2A.3A$116.A$44.C65.2A.3A$43.C.C65.A.A$44.2C65.A.A$112.A
2$87.A$87.3A8.3D7.2A$90.A8.D8.A.A$27.C61.2A8.3D8.A$7.2A17.C.C81.2A$6.
A.A17.C.C48.2A$6.A20.C50.A$5.2A71.A.A$17.2A49.A10.2A$17.2A47.3A$31.C
11.C21.A$30.3C9.3C20.2A$30.3C9.3C5.2A$51.A$30.4C.2C.2C.4C6.A.2A47.2A$
28.C.C5.C.C5.C.C5.A2.A23.D22.A.A$31.2C3.C.C3.2C9.2A24.D.D22.A$27.C2.C
2.3C3.3C2.C2.C20.2A9.3D22.2A$27.C.C15.C.C20.2A11.D10.2A3.2A$90.A2.A4.
A$90.3A5.A.A$99.2A$77.A3.2A7.3A$76.A.A3.A7.A2.A$75.A.A3.A10.2A$71.2A.
A.A3.A$71.2A.A2.4A.A$75.A.A3.2A$71.2A.2A.A.A$72.A.A3.A.3A$60.2A10.A.A
4.A2.A$60.2A11.A6.2A201$30.3A9.3A$31.A11.A2$30.A2.A.A3.A.A2.A$28.3A.
5A.5A.3A$28.2A2.3A.A.A.3A2.2A$27.3A15.3A$28.2A5.A3.A5.2A!
Was going to use
Extrementhusiast's HWSS Heisenburp from 2013 to extract a couple of signals to do the cleanup, but it turned out that it would have had to be rebuilt pretty thoroughly to let an HWSS-on-HWSS get through. Looks like it could use a rebuild with modern technology anyway, of course --!
EDIT: There was an even older HWSS Heisenburp, from 2011, which had a fairly Rube Goldbergian reconstruction recipe. And yet it wasn't really all that terrible... I mean, five signals is pretty bad, but they only had to be sent in the correct order, not precisely synchronized, and the whole active mechanism was on one side of the HWSS lane -- though unfortunately the output went to the other side:
Code: Select all
x = 195, y = 113, rule = LifeHistory
123.4B$122.4B$121.4B$120.4B$119.4B$84.A33.4B$84.3A30.4B$87.A28.4B$86.
2A27.4B$86.4B24.4B$88.3B22.4B$7B2A186B$5BA4BA184B$11BA183B$5BA5BA183B
$6B6A183B$195B$195B$95.4B6.4B.12B$96.4B4.4B2.4BD9B$97.4B2.4B3.3BDBDB
2D6B$98.8B4.3BDBDB2D8B$99.6B2.7BD12B$100.4B.25B$90.B2.38B$89.43B.B$
89.32B3C9B2A$87.30B2C2BC9B.B2A$87.30B2C3BC3B2.2B3.B$86.BA14B2.23B$86.
ABA10B7.22B$86.ABA8B5.11BD15B$87.A8B6.7B2CBDBD8B3.4B$87.10B4.7BCBCBDB
D7B5.4B$88.9B5.8BC2BD7B7.4B$89.8B5.20B7.4B$89.7B6.20B8.4B$90.5B6.20B
10.4B$92.2B6.22B10.4B$99.7B.16B10.4B$98.7B2.17B10.4B$90.2A5.7B5.7B3CB
.4B10.4B$89.B2AB3.7B6.8BC2B2.4B10.4B$90.2B3.7B6.7B3C2B3.4B10.4B$89.2B
3.7B6.13B4.4B10.4B$88.BA2B.7B6.4B4.7B4.4B10.4B$88.A.A8B6.4B5.8B4.4B
10.4B$89.A.7B6.4B7.8B4.4B10.4B$86.3A4.4B6.4B8.8B5.4B10.4B$86.A5.4B6.
4B8.6B2.B2A4.4B10.4B$91.4B6.4B9.7B.BA.A4.4B10.4B$90.4B6.4B11.6B4.A5.
4B10.4B$89.4B6.4B12.6B4.2A5.4B10.4B$88.4B6.4B13.6B12.4B10.4B$87.4B6.
4B13.8B12.4B10.4B$86.4B6.4B35.4B10.4B$85.4B6.4B37.4B10.4B$84.4B6.4B
39.4B10.4B$83.4B6.4B41.4B10.4B$82.4B6.4B43.4B10.4B$81.4B6.4B45.4B10.
4B$80.4B6.4B47.4B10.4B$79.4B6.4B49.4B10.4B$78.4B6.4B51.4B10.4B$77.4B
6.4B53.4B10.4B$76.4B6.4B55.4B10.4B$75.4B6.4B57.4B10.4B$74.4B6.4B59.4B
10.4B$73.4B6.4B61.4B10.4B$72.4B6.4B63.4B10.4B$71.4B6.4B65.4B10.4B$70.
4B6.4B67.4B10.4B$69.4B6.4B69.4B10.4B$68.4B6.4B71.4B10.4B$67.4B6.4B73.
4B10.4B$66.4B6.4B75.4B10.4B$65.4B6.4B77.4B10.4B$64.4B6.4B79.4B10.4B$
63.4B6.4B81.4B10.4B$62.4B6.4B83.4B10.4B$61.4B6.4B85.4B10.4B$60.4B6.4B
87.4B10.4B$59.4B6.4B89.4B10.4B$58.4B6.4B91.4B10.4B$57.4B6.4B93.4B10.
4B$56.4B6.4B95.4B10.4B$55.4B6.4B97.4B10.4B$54.4B6.4B99.4B10.4B$53.4B
6.4B101.4B10.4B$52.4B6.4B103.4B10.4B$51.4B6.4B105.4B10.4B$50.4B6.4B
107.4B10.4B$49.4B6.4B109.4B10.4B$48.4B6.4B111.4B10.4B$47.4B6.4B113.4B
10.4B$46.4B6.4B115.4B10.4B$45.4B6.4B117.4B10.4B$44.4B6.4B119.4B10.4B$
43.4B6.4B121.4B10.3B$42.4B6.4B123.4B10.2B$41.4B6.4B125.4B10.B$40.4B6.
4B127.4B$39.4B6.4B129.4B$38.4B6.4B131.4B$37.4B6.4B133.4B$36.4B6.4B
135.4B$35.4B6.4B137.4B$34.4B6.4B139.4B$33.4B6.4B141.4B$32.4B6.4B143.
4B$31.4B6.2C2B145.2B2C$30.4B6.CBCB147.BCBC$29.4B6.3BC149.C2B!
Seems like modern technology ought to allow for some kind of improvement here. Maybe just
synchronizing these three gliders -- that would put everything on one side of the track, so the Heisenburp would be compatible with all kinds of HWSS flotillas.