Are Game-of-Life images under copyright?

For general discussion about Conway's Game of Life.
Post Reply
Peter Armstrong
Posts: 10
Joined: February 27th, 2016, 12:48 pm

Are Game-of-Life images under copyright?

Post by Peter Armstrong » February 27th, 2016, 1:45 pm

I have written some music - a short piano piece - based on Dean Hickerson's and Paul Callahan's "Thin Rake"
image, and am now searching to identify permissions needed to proceed with copyright (of a derivative work!)
and publication (which would be by IMSLP's "Edition Ottaviano Pettruci"). So far, my attempts to reach DH
and PC have email-wise failed. My search meanwhile at the Copyright Office, while it turned up nothing, may
have been just insufficient. So, I'll ask the Forum: Is "Thin Rake" itself, or are published Game of Life images
generally, under copyright? Thanks in advance for your time. PA

drc
Posts: 1664
Joined: December 3rd, 2015, 4:11 pm

Re: Are Game-of-Life images under copyright?

Post by drc » February 27th, 2016, 1:55 pm

Probably not. i don't know though: I'm not very knowledgeable on copyright, especially with the state of youtube now.

Sokwe
Moderator
Posts: 2688
Joined: July 9th, 2009, 2:44 pm

Re: Are Game-of-Life images under copyright?

Post by Sokwe » February 27th, 2016, 7:26 pm

I am absolutely sure that neither of them will mind (just be sure to give appropriate attributions). If you want, you can try messaging Dean Hickerson on these forums.

The Life community is entirely built on sharing and building on each other's work.
-Matthias Merzenich

User avatar
Scorbie
Posts: 1692
Joined: December 7th, 2013, 1:05 am

Re: Are Game-of-Life images under copyright?

Post by Scorbie » February 28th, 2016, 1:05 pm

Just out of curiosity, how did you use the "thin rake" pattern in your composition?
Edit: Although I am a novice in music, I am interested in your work. If copyright is not a problem, is there a chance to see/hear it?

User avatar
Kiran
Posts: 285
Joined: March 4th, 2015, 6:48 pm

Re: Are Game-of-Life images under copyright?

Post by Kiran » February 28th, 2016, 4:02 pm

The Life community is entirely built on sharing and building on each other's work.
Agreed! If you want us to help you protect your work from us, don't expect any help.
Kiran Linsuain

User avatar
calcyman
Moderator
Posts: 2938
Joined: June 1st, 2009, 4:32 pm

Re: Are Game-of-Life images under copyright?

Post by calcyman » February 29th, 2016, 7:23 am

I personally publish everything under the licence CC-BY 4.0, which means you can use it for arbitrary purposes (including commercial) on the condition that the author is attributed.

I suggest checking the licence information for Golly, but my best guess is that a similar licence covers Golly (and its pattern collection). It might possibly be the more restrictive and memetic licence CC-BY-SA 4.0, which requires that any derivative work be shared under the same licence.
What do you do with ill crystallographers? Take them to the mono-clinic!

User avatar
dvgrn
Moderator
Posts: 10685
Joined: May 17th, 2009, 11:00 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Re: Are Game-of-Life images under copyright?

Post by dvgrn » February 29th, 2016, 2:41 pm

calcyman wrote:I suggest checking the licence information for Golly, but my best guess is that a similar licence covers Golly (and its pattern collection).
Golly is not too relevant, I believe, since THINRAKE.LIF isn't in Golly's pattern collection -- though it's in Alan Hensel's 'lifep' collection, available through Golly's Help > Online Archives. That 'lifep' collection was put together in 1995 I believe, but the pattern is older than that. The method for constructing the Thin Rake was described in David Bell's Spaceships in Conway's Life (Part 6) in October 1992.

Looks like there's a version of the same rake in various Xlife pattern collections, but it's tricky to read these days because it's in Paul Callahan's #I structured format. Nobody ever taught Golly how to read that format, because very few patterns use it (and they're all in that same Xlife collection)... Turns out rakep960b.life is not quite the same pattern, but definitely the same idea --

rakep960b.life:

Code: Select all

#C Starting with period 120 block layer, we thin 3 times and
#C toss off gliders in the final stage to achieve a period 960 rake. 
x = 1101, y = 268, rule = B3/S23
475b4o604b4o$474b6o602b6o$424b2o48b4ob2o551b2o48b4ob2o$420b4ob2o51b2o
548b4ob2o51b2o$420b6o602b6o$421b4o64b2o538b4o64b2o$488b4o604b4o$436b2o
50b2ob2o551b2o50b2ob2o$434b2ob2o42bo2bo5b2o550b2ob2o42bo2bo5b2o$430bo
3b4o43bo3bo552bo3b4o43bo3bo$425b2o2bobo3b2o32bo10bo4b2o546b2o2bobo3b2o
32bo10bo4b2o$414bo9bo2b2o3bo36bobo9bo3bo536bo9bo2b2o3bo36bobo9bo3bo$
413bo11b2o2bobo3b2o32b2o10bo2bo5b2o529bo11b2o2bobo3b2o32b2o10bo2bo5b2o
$413b3o14bo3b4o50b2ob2o528b3o14bo3b4o50b2ob2o$434b2ob2o49b4o550b2ob2o
49b4o$421b2o13b2o51b2o538b2o13b2o51b2o$419bo4bo26bo22b6o547bo4bo26bo
22b6o$396bo28bo25bobo19bo5bo524bo28bo25bobo19bo5bo$395bo23bo5bo25b2o
26bo523bo23bo5bo25b2o26bo$395b3o22b6o47bo4bo524b3o22b6o47bo4bo$475b2o
606b2o2$433bo607bo$378bo54bobo550bo54bobo$377bo55b2o550bo55b2o$377b3o
605b3o3$415bo607bo$360bo54bobo550bo54bobo$359bo55b2o550bo55b2o$359b3o
367b2o236b3o$116b2o609bo4bo$114bo4bo613bo$120bo276bo329bo5bo271bo$114b
o5bo221bo54bobo328b6o216bo54bobo$115b6o220bo55b2o550bo55b2o$341b3o397b
o2bo204b3o$128bo2bo613bo$132bo608bo3bo$128bo3bo246bo362b4o241bo$116b2o
11b4o191bo54bobo351b2o2b3o192bo54bobo$118bob2o2b3o196bo55b2o342bo9b2o
2b3o191bo55b2o$112b2o2b2o2b2o2b3o196b3o102b4o289b2o10b2o2b3o191b3o102b
4o$120b2o2b3o300b6o289b2o18b4o289b6o$129b4o294b4ob2o307bo3bo289b4ob2o$
101bo26bo3bo228bo69b2o312bo223bo69b2o$99b2o31bo173bo54bobo364b4o9bo2bo
169bo54bobo$100b2o13b4o9bo2bo173bo55b2o79b2o261bo21b6o180bo55b2o79b2o$
114b6o185b3o133b4o258b2o22b4ob2o179b3o133b4o$114b4ob2o320b2ob2o258b2o
25b2o316b2ob2o$118b2o314bo2bo5b2o597bo2bo5b2o$343bo90bo3bo512bo90bo3bo
$288bo54bobo76bo10bo4b2o456bo54bobo76bo10bo4b2o$287bo55b2o77bobo9bo3bo
248bo207bo55b2o77bobo9bo3bo$287b3o132b2o10bo2bo5b2o240b2o208b3o132b2o
10bo2bo5b2o$441b2ob2o240b2o361b2ob2o$441b4o604b4o$325bo116b2o489bo116b
2o$270bo54bobo76bo22b6o445bo54bobo76bo22b6o$269bo55b2o77bobo19bo5bo
236bo207bo55b2o77bobo19bo5bo$269b3o132b2o26bo234b2o208b3o132b2o26bo$
426bo4bo236b2o364bo4bo$428b2o606b2o$307bo607bo$252bo54bobo76bo473bo54b
obo76bo$251bo55b2o77bobo262bo207bo55b2o77bobo$251b3o132b2o261b2o208b3o
132b2o$650b2o2$289bo607bo$234bo54bobo76bo473bo54bobo76bo$233bo55b2o77b
obo262bo207bo55b2o77bobo$233b3o132b2o261b2o208b3o132b2o$443b2o187b2o$
439b4ob2o$439b6o$350bo89b4o514bo$350bobo262bo342bobo$350b2o103b2o156b
2o343b2o$453b2ob2o156b2o$449bo3b4o$444b2o2bobo3b2o$332bo110bo2b2o3bo
488bo$332bobo109b2o2bobo3b2o141bo342bobo$332b2o115bo3b4o138b2o343b2o$
453b2ob2o138b2o$440b2o13b2o$438bo4bo$314bo129bo477bo$28bo285bobo121bo
5bo134bo56bo285bobo$26bo3bo283b2o123b6o132b2o55bo3bo283b2o$31bo546b2o
59bo$26bo4bo602bo4bo$27b5o603b5o$296bo607bo$296bobo262bo342bobo$296b2o
148b2o111b2o343b2o$442b4ob2o111b2o$442b6o$443b4o9bo2bo$278bo181bo425bo
$278bobo175bo3bo82bo342bobo$278b2o177b4o80b2o343b2o$448b2o2b3o87b2o$
448b2o2b3o$448b2o2b3o$260bo196b4o407bo$260bobo193bo3bo407bobo$260b2o
198bo407b2o$456bo2bo2$443b6o$242bo199bo5bo401bo$242bobo71b5o127bo401bo
bo$242b2o71bo4bo121bo4bo402b2o$320bo123b2o$305b6o4bo3bo$304bo5bo6bo$
310bo$304bo4bo$306b2o11$993b2o$990b3ob2o$990b5o$991b3o5$1048b2o5bo2bo$
1047b4o8bo$1047b2ob2o3bo3bo$1049b2o5b4o3$2b2o606b2o376b2o$o4bo602bo4bo
371b3ob2o56b2o$6bo607bo370b5o56b2o7b3o$o5bo6bo594bo5bo6bo364b3o58bo2bo
6bo$b6o4bo3bo593b6o4bo3bo424bo6bobo$16bo123b2o482bo123b2o300b2o3b2o$
11bo4bo121bo4bo402b2o71bo4bo121bo4bo$12b5o127bo401bobo71b5o127bo$138bo
5bo401bo199bo5bo302bo2bo$139b6o602b6o306bo$1037bo2bo14bo3bo$152bo2bo
604bo2bo277bo14b4o$156bo407b2o198bo272bo3bo$152bo3bo407bobo193bo3bo
273b4o$153b4o407bo196b4o$144b2o2b3o601b2o2b3o$144b2o2b3o601b2o2b3o287b
2o$144b2o2b3o87b2o512b2o2b3o87b2o196bo4bo$153b4o80b2o343b2o177b4o80b2o
203bo$152bo3bo82bo342bobo175bo3bo82bo196bo5bo$156bo425bo181bo280b6o$
139b4o9bo2bo591b4o9bo2bo296b2o$138b6o602b6o307b4o$138b4ob2o111b2o488b
4ob2o111b2o138b5o50b2ob2o$142b2o111b2o343b2o148b2o111b2o138bo4bo52b2o$
257bo342bobo262bo142bo45bobo$600bo402bo3bo45bo2b2o$331b5o669bo48bobo$
330bo4bo725b2o$274b2o59bo546b2o175b2ob2o$135b6o132b2o55bo3bo283b2o123b
6o132b2o176b4o$134bo5bo134bo56bo285bobo121bo5bo134bo176b2o$140bo477bo
129bo$134bo4bo602bo4bo301b2o$136b2o13b2o591b2o13b2o284b4ob2o$149b2ob2o
138b2o463b2ob2o138b2o143b6o$145bo3b4o138b2o343b2o115bo3b4o138b2o145b4o
$140b2o2bobo3b2o141bo342bobo109b2o2bobo3b2o141bo$139bo2b2o3bo488bo110b
o2b2o3bo$140b2o2bobo3b2o596b2o2bobo3b2o$145bo3b4o600bo3b4o$149b2ob2o
156b2o445b2ob2o156b2o$151b2o156b2o343b2o103b2o156b2o$311bo342bobo262bo
$136b4o514bo89b4o$135b6o602b6o$135b4ob2o601b4ob2o$139b2o187b2o417b2o
187b2o$327b2o208b3o132b2o261b2o$329bo207bo55b2o77bobo262bo$538bo54bobo
76bo$593bo2$346b2o606b2o$345b2o208b3o132b2o261b2o$347bo207bo55b2o77bob
o262bo$556bo54bobo76bo$611bo$118b2o612b2o$116bo4bo242b2o364bo4bo236b2o
$122bo240b2o208b3o132b2o26bo234b2o$116bo5bo242bo207bo55b2o77bobo19bo5b
o236bo$117b6o451bo54bobo76bo22b6o$103b2o27b2o495bo116b2o$103bobo25b4o
610b4o$103bo27b2ob2o246b2o361b2ob2o240b2o$124bo2bo5b2o246b2o208b3o132b
2o10bo2bo5b2o240b2o$115bo8bo3bo254bo207bo55b2o77bobo9bo3bo248bo$116bo
2b2o2bo4b2o462bo54bobo76bo10bo4b2o$115bo3b2o3bo3bo518bo90bo3bo$120bo3b
o2bo5b2o603bo2bo5b2o$131b2ob2o264b2o25b2o316b2ob2o258b2o25b2o$131b4o
264b2o22b4ob2o179b3o133b4o258b2o22b4ob2o$132b2o267bo21b6o180bo55b2o79b
2o261bo21b6o$424b4o9bo2bo169bo54bobo364b4o9bo2bo$121b2o318bo223bo69b2o
312bo$117b4ob2o313bo3bo289b4ob2o307bo3bo$117b6o295b2o18b4o289b6o289b2o
18b4o$118b4o295b2o10b2o2b3o191b3o102b4o289b2o10b2o2b3o$419bo9b2o2b3o
191bo55b2o342bo9b2o2b3o$429b2o2b3o192bo54bobo351b2o2b3o$438b4o241bo
362b4o$437bo3bo603bo3bo$441bo607bo$437bo2bo204b3o397bo2bo$645bo55b2o$
424b6o216bo54bobo328b6o$423bo5bo271bo329bo5bo$429bo607bo$423bo4bo602bo
4bo$425b2o236b3o367b2o$663bo55b2o$664bo54bobo$719bo3$681b3o$681bo55b2o
$682bo54bobo$737bo2$779b2o$699b3o22b6o47bo4bo$699bo23bo5bo25b2o26bo$
700bo28bo25bobo19bo5bo$723bo4bo26bo22b6o$725b2o13b2o51b2o$738b2ob2o49b
4o$717b3o14bo3b4o50b2ob2o$717bo11b2o2bobo3b2o32b2o10bo2bo5b2o$718bo9bo
2b2o3bo36bobo9bo3bo$729b2o2bobo3b2o32bo10bo4b2o$734bo3b4o43bo3bo$738b
2ob2o42bo2bo5b2o$740b2o50b2ob2o$792b4o$725b4o64b2o$724b6o$724b4ob2o51b
2o$728b2o48b4ob2o$778b6o$779b4o!
Peter Armstrong wrote:I'll ask the Forum: Is "Thin Rake" itself, or are published Game of Life images
generally, under copyright?
There's a very long-standing tradition that making a Life pattern available puts it more or less into the public domain, unless the author specifically states otherwise. And that almost never happens. Certainly Dean Hickerson and Paul Callahan put no restrictions on the Thin Gun.

If you want to quote some text written by the author that accompanies a pattern, it might be good to ask permission there. But to re-use the actual pattern in any derivative work, including another Life pattern or a work of art, there's no need to ask anyone to sign off in advance.

As others have mentioned, it's standard practice to give appropriate attribution. This generally means 1) don't imply by omission that you constructed the pattern all by yourself, and 2) provide a good pointer to where anyone interested could find the original pattern. In this case, something like "Thin Rake (THINRAKE.LIF) by Dean Hickerson and Paul Callahan, in Alan Hensel's 'lifep' pattern collection" should be plenty.

Peter Armstrong
Posts: 10
Joined: February 27th, 2016, 12:48 pm

Re: Are Game-of-Life images under copyright?

Post by Peter Armstrong » February 29th, 2016, 4:26 pm

for dvgrn: Thank you for identifying the Hensel collection. I'll add this to my attribution line.

for Scorbie: I've described in the piece's intro ('NOTES') page. Simply, it's built on a mapping of the individual squares -- horizontally to time, vertically to pitch, with some license re the latter as its range exceeds the piano's by about two octaves. (Tricky was to find transpositions minimizing collision or other pattern disturbance.) And I've superimposed a metrical scheme, so that human players -- two, to get enough fingers -- may hope to keep their
bearings. Once the paint's dry, I'll yell here, and will be posting freely accessible score and audio on IMSLP and SoundCloud.

Thanks, All, for the feedback!

User avatar
vyznev
Posts: 27
Joined: April 23rd, 2016, 4:08 am

Re: Are Game-of-Life images under copyright?

Post by vyznev » April 24th, 2016, 2:07 pm

Peter Armstrong wrote:Is "Thin Rake" itself, or are published Game of Life images generally, under copyright?
This is actually an interesting question in itself. I Am Not A Lawyer, but my general understanding is that:
  • on one hand, any original creative work can be copyrighted (and, under the Berne convention, automatically is, if it meets the threshold of originality), but
  • on the other hand, mere ideas, facts and mathematical truths are not eligible for copyright.
So the question basically comes down to whether a cellular automaton pattern is a creative work, with a human author whose original creativity the pattern embodies, or a mere statement of a mathematical fact about the behavior of the automaton rule. And the answer almost certainly is "it depends."

In particular, any two-color bitmap image can be a GoL pattern (possibly a Garden of Eden, but still), so technically, it's clear that some GoL patterns must be eligible for copyright. There are even ways to encode arbitrary bitmaps into e.g. GoL still lifes or flotillas, demonstrating that such patterns (if sufficiently complex and arbitrary) may be copyrightable too.

On the other hand, clearly e.g. the existence of small spaceships like the glider (or the *WSS, or even the loafer or the copperhead) is a nontrivial emergent property of the B3/S23 rule (which itself is too simple to be copyrighted), and a pattern showing such a spaceship is merely the natural expression of this mathematical fact (and thus, per the merger doctrine, cannot be copyrighted). Finding such patterns might take a lot of creativity and hard work, but the patterns themselves are mathematical facts, and thus not copyrightable.

So what about large constructed spaceships (or other "functional" patterns, like rakes or puffers or guns, etc.) like the caterpillar or, say, Hickerson and Callahan's thin p960 rake? While the simplest of those might be borderline cases, I suspect that most of them would technically be copyrightable, on the same grounds on which computer software is considered copyrightable. Basically, while e.g. the fact that a 17c/45 spaceship exists (and can be constructed using certain parts and techniques) is not copyrightable, as long as such a ship could be constructed in many ways, the specific choice of how to put the parts together may be considered creative and original, and therefore eligible for copyright.

Of course, as dvgrn notes above, there's a longstanding tradition that published GoL patterns are considered to be freely usable by anyone, at least for the conventional purposes of experimentation, non-commercial distribution and adaptation. Given that such patterns are usually generated by hobbyists and academics, and that there's normally little if any commercial interest or opportunity involved, any motivation for anyone to actually pursue a copyright claim on a GoL pattern, even if they might technically have one, is extremely limited.

Whether that tradition would actually stand up in court as a defence against a copyright infringement claim, should someone decide to raise one, is something that cannot be definitely answered until and unless such an unlikely lawsuit actually comes up. And even then, it might well depend on the specific facts of the case, the jurisdiction it was brought up in, and ultimately the whims of the judge(s) involved. Personally (and still keeping in mind that I'm just a random layperson) I suspect that, on its own, such an appeal to tradition would carry little weight, although it might be enough to let the infringement be considered non-willful, if the accused infringer was acting in good faith under established custom. That said, the kind of uses one would typically make of a GoL pattern (i.e. academic or hobbyist research) could very likely be considered fair use (or equivalent in other jurisdictions) anyway, and a tradition of such use being tolerated in the community might well be weighed as one factor when considering this.

Anyway, my advice to the OP would be that, if they're going to use a complex constructed GoL pattern as part of a creative work, and especially if they may wish to someday profit commercially from that work, the safest course would be to ask for permission from the creators of the pattern in advance. While it's extremely unlikely that anyone would bother to sue anyone else over a GoL pattern, it's still better to be safe than sorry, especially if there might be money involved. Besides, it's the polite thing to do, anyway.

Peter Armstrong
Posts: 10
Joined: February 27th, 2016, 12:48 pm

Re: Are Game-of-Life images under copyright?

Post by Peter Armstrong » May 2nd, 2016, 5:32 pm

Thank you, vyznev, for your thought and time. I just want to note: that Dean Hickerson and Paul Callahan both indicated non-objection to my copyrighting the piece; that I've published it via IMSLP's Edition Ottiavano Petrucci
under Creative Commons' Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license; and that, as IMSLP has posted both score and audio on the internet for free download, I'll be expecting next to zero hard-copy sales.

Post Reply