Methuselah Lidka improved

For discussion of specific patterns or specific families of patterns, both newly-discovered and well-known.
Post Reply
User avatar
Mats
Posts: 42
Joined: August 10th, 2010, 7:40 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Methuselah Lidka improved

Post by Mats » December 29th, 2010, 8:25 am

Today I found a way to add another 45 generations to David Bell's version ov Lidka:

Code: Select all

x = 13, y = 12, rule = B3/S23
bo$obo$bo6$8b2ob2o$8bobobo$12bo$11bo!
The lifespan is 29100 generations. Is it the longest lifespan known for a methuselah with 13 or fewer cells?

User avatar
calcyman
Moderator
Posts: 2938
Joined: June 1st, 2009, 4:32 pm

Re: Methuselah Lidka improved

Post by calcyman » December 29th, 2010, 1:53 pm

Is it the longest lifespan known for a methuselah with 13 or fewer cells?
That is indeed the longest-lived 13-cell methuselah in a 13*13 box. (An 8-cell methuselah in a 7500*7500 bounding box could last longer, for instance.)


Anyway, that's cause for celebration!


As for the longest-lived x-cell methuselahs in a x*x box, I believe the records are:

1 1
2 1
3 2
4 10
5 1105
6 1108
7 5206
8 7468
9 17410
10 17423
11 17465
12 23334
13 29100

This is a weakly-increasing uncomputable function, and thus there is no O() bound based on computable functions. It should be possible to impose a limit of O(BB(f(x))), where BB() denotes Rado's 'Busy Beaver' function, but this limit will grow much faster than the actual function for small values of x.
What do you do with ill crystallographers? Take them to the mono-clinic!

User avatar
dvgrn
Moderator
Posts: 10682
Joined: May 17th, 2009, 11:00 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Re: Methuselah Lidka improved

Post by dvgrn » December 29th, 2010, 2:39 pm

calcyman wrote:As for the longest-lived x-cell methuselahs in a x*x box, I believe the records are:

1 1
2 1
3 2
4 10
...
o$obo$o! lasts for 11 ticks, I believe; the classic T-tetromino lasts 9. Is there a four-cell traffic-light predecessor that lasts exactly 10 generations?

User avatar
Lewis
Posts: 337
Joined: March 17th, 2009, 5:26 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Methuselah Lidka improved

Post by Lewis » December 29th, 2010, 2:52 pm

dvgrn wrote:Is there a four-cell traffic-light predecessor that lasts exactly 10 generations?
This 4-cell predecessor lasts 10 generations:

Code: Select all

x = 3, y = 3, rule = B3/S23
o$b2o$o!

Sokwe
Moderator
Posts: 2688
Joined: July 9th, 2009, 2:44 pm

Re: Methuselah Lidka improved

Post by Sokwe » December 30th, 2010, 8:04 pm

These two predecessors increase the lifespan by one generation while staying within the constraints in Calcyman's post:

Code: Select all

x = 25, y = 5, rule = B3/S23
4bo$2obo16b2ob2o$o3bo15bo3bo$2bobo17bo$3bo19b2o!
These two one-generation predecessors result in a smaller bounding box (14*10):

Code: Select all

x = 28, y = 4, rule = B3/S23
3bo19bo$4bo19bo$obobo17bobo$2bo2b3o12bobo2b3o!
I did some limited searching for 2-generation and 3-generation predecessors but was unsuccessful.
-Matthias Merzenich

User avatar
Mats
Posts: 42
Joined: August 10th, 2010, 7:40 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: Methuselah Lidka improved

Post by Mats » December 31st, 2010, 12:23 pm

Sokwe wrote:These two one-generation predecessors result in a smaller bounding box (14*10)
Or you can arrange the tub and either one of them in an even smaller bounding box (4*20):

Code: Select all

x = 4, y = 20, rule = B3/S23
bo$obo$bo10$3bo2$2b2o$o$b2o$3bo$3bo$3bo!

137ben
Posts: 343
Joined: June 18th, 2010, 8:18 pm

Re: Methuselah Lidka improved

Post by 137ben » January 2nd, 2011, 10:17 am

The following 3 by 4 pattern that I found a few years ago lasts 1104 generations:

Code: Select all

x = 3, y = 4, rule = B3/S23
b2o$obo$2bo$bo!
So f(4) is substantially higher than Calcyman indicated.

User avatar
Mats
Posts: 42
Joined: August 10th, 2010, 7:40 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: Methuselah Lidka improved

Post by Mats » January 2nd, 2011, 10:43 am

That's a 6-cell pattern so it's a contestant for f(6), not f(4).

137ben
Posts: 343
Joined: June 18th, 2010, 8:18 pm

Re: Methuselah Lidka improved

Post by 137ben » January 2nd, 2011, 6:48 pm

Ah, I thought we were just looking at bounding box, now I see that the pattern must have x cells AND be contained in a x by x box...never mind :P

Post Reply