simsim314 wrote:@dvgrn The new Kazyan circuits from the messages above, and Pi->G (posted by chris_c) and Pi->2G from Kazyan with some cool splitter from bellman somewhere on the forum, should be added as well to the list of conduits.
Okay, I've done the review and integrated (I think) everything from both collections, plus all the suggestions that have showed up as of right now. Kazyan's earlier pi-to-R is included for the moment, the first of the two in
this post, but with a question mark; seems to me it should probably be removed unless and until it can be proven useful, by connecting it with something.
It would be nice to be able to keep an organized collection of converters that don't work yet, but that may possibly someday connect to some other conduit as yet unknown. But I don't think this collection is the right storage place for those -- well, maybe a separate corral off to the side or something. Here's the link to where the
main relabeled alphabetized stamp collection is posted. It seems crowded enough with only the known good conduits in it. Might be a good idea to take out the X-to-Gs and X-to-G(n)s, once we have them catalogued better in separate collections.
Again, I'm officially abandoning this alphabetized elementary-conduits pattern in its current state. Anyone else should feel free to pick it up and run with it if they want to (e.g., to a new Elementary Conduits thread where I'm stubbornly refusing to make the first post...!)
simsim314 wrote:We now have spartan G4, G5 and G6 transceivers. Which one is the most "efficient"? (i.e. SL count / recovery or maybe just SL count as simplicity measure).
For compactness and fast recovery time I think I'd vote for your new
B357+4N and Lx369+4N. The G13 variant also has the advantage that a semi-Snark can reflect a glider onto one of the input lanes:
Code:
Select all
x = 155, y = 97, rule = LifeHistory
69.A$69.3A$72.A$71.2A2$41.2A67.A$42.A$29.A11.A$29.3A9.2A$32.A89.2A$
19.2A10.2A90.A$.2A17.A101.A$2.A17.A.A99.2A$.A19.2A$.2A41.2A15.A91.A$
44.2A15.A.A29.E58.A.A$61.3A29.E.D56.A.A$63.A29.3E.2A54.A$95.E.2A26.2A
15.C$125.2A15.C.D$A3.2A15.C120.3C$2A2.2A15.C.D120.C$.2A18.3C$2A21.C
11.2A$35.A44.2A$36.3A41.A.A$38.A34.2A7.A52.2A$73.2A7.2A52.A$14.2A104.
2A11.3A$15.A20.2A82.2A11.A$12.3A21.2A$12.A$106.2A$27.2A78.A$27.A.A74.
3A$28.A75.A$116.2A$116.A$33.2D82.3A$31.2A2D84.A$31.2A$26.2A$25.A.A$
25.A$24.2A13.2A$39.A$32.2A6.3A$32.2A8.A11$52.2A$52.2A3$43.2A$43.A.A$
44.A$77.2A$77.2A$49.2D61.2A$47.2A2D62.A$47.2A63.A$42.2A68.2A$41.A.A
59.2A$41.A61.A.A37.A$40.2A13.2A47.A37.A.A$55.A86.A.A$48.2A6.3A84.A$
48.2A8.A52.D3.2A15.C$84.2A25.2D2.2A15.C.D$60.2A22.2A13.2D11.2D18.3C$
61.A9.2D27.2D10.D21.C$61.A.A6.D2.D26.D10.D$62.2A7.2D$66.2A$65.A2.A$
65.A.A$66.A2$75.2A$74.A.A$74.A$73.2A$63.2A21.2A$64.A21.2A$61.3A$61.A$
88.2A$88.2A!
#C [[ THUMBNAIL AUTOSTART HEIGHT 320 STEP 4 ZOOM 3 LOOP 1024 ]]
Let's see, that gives some new composite transceiver options... I'm pretty sure there are conduits with forward glider outputs that make for better timing, so this is just a random sample:
Code: Select all
x = 105, y = 129, rule = LifeHistory
21.B2A$19.2BA2BAB$19.3B2A3B$17.12B$16.14B$17.13B$17.14B$16.15B$16.14B
$16.13B$16.B3D4B.3B$16.2BD4B$16.2B3D2B$16.6B$15.7B$14.8B$13.8B$12.9B$
11.2A2B.6B$10.A.AB.7B$10.A.B2.6B71.A$9.2A4.6B69.3A$15.6B68.A10.A$14.
8B67.2A8.A.A$15.8B49.A14.4B8.A.A$14.9B49.3A9.5B9.2A.3A$14.9B52.A7.8B.
B6.B4.A$14.10B50.2A6.12B3.B2AB3A$14.5B2A3B50.5B2.15B.B2A.A$14.5B2A4B
51.24B$14.11B50.2A21B$14.4BD7BA.2A45.2A21B$16.B3D4B2.2A.A46.B.19B$16.
D2B2D2B55.17B$16.6B57.17B$16.6B58.15B$16.7B58.13B$14.8B56.15B$14.8B
55.12B2.2B$13.9B.BA52.12B$13.10BA.A51.11B$12.3B.7B.2A51.B3D4B.4B$11.
10B56.2BD4B4.2A$11.6BD3B56.2B3D2B4.A$10.6B3D3B55.6B6.3A$10.8BD2B55.7B
8.A$10.10B55.8B$9.8B57.8B$9.8B56.9B$8.10B54.4B.6B$8.10B53.4B.7B14.A$
6.13B51.4B2.6B13.3A$5.14B50.4B3.8B4.B5.A$5.15B48.5B4.B2A6B.4B3.2A$.2B
.17B46.4B5.2B2A16B$2A20B44.4B7.17B$2A20B43.4B9.17B$.2B.2AB.15B41.4B
13.13B$4.2AB2.15B39.4B13.12B$8.10B2A5B37.4B14.10B$8.10B2A5B36.4B14.
11B$8.18B34.4B15.7B.2B$7.20B32.4B15.11B$7.20B31.4B17.11B$8.B.18B29.4B
18.11B$9.20B.B25.4B19.11B$10.18B.B2A23.4B18.2AB2.4B3DB$8.22B2A22.4B
18.A.AB3.4BD2B$8.2A.17B.2B22.4B19.A6.2B3D2B$9.A3.15B24.4B19.2A7.6B$6.
3A5.14B23.4B29.7B$6.A6.3BD6B2.4B21.4B30.8B$11.4BDBD5B3.4B19.4B32.8B$
11.4BDBD4B5.4B17.4B33.9B$9.7BD5B6.4B15.4B33.6B.2B2A$9.12B8.4B13.4B34.
7B.BABA$7.6BA7B9.4B11.4B36.6B2.2BAB$6.6BABAB.5B9.4B9.4B37.6B3.B2A$6.
5BA2BAB3.4B9.4B7.4B38.6B4.2B$6.6B2AB5.4B9.4B5.4B38.8B4.B$4.2AB.9B4.4B
9.3B4.4B38.8B$3.A.AB2.2B4.2A5.4B9.2B3.4B39.9B$3.A11.A7.4B8.2B2.4B40.
9B$2.2A12.3A5.4B6.3B2.3B40.10B$18.A6.4B4.4B2.3B40.3B2A5B$39.4B33.2A3.
4B2A5B$40.4B33.A3.11B$28.4B2.4B3.4B32.A.A12B$22.2A5.8B5.4B26.2A4.2A2.
8B$23.A5.7B7.4B7.A18.A9.7B4.2A$23.A.AB.7B9.4B6.3A16.A.AB7.6B4.A$24.2A
B.9B8.4B8.A16.2AB.3B3.6B.BA.A$26.11B.2B6.4B6.2A18.14B.B2A$26.13B2A6.
4B5.6B14.16B$26.13B2A7.4B6.5B14.14B$26.10B2.2B9.4B4.7B12.16B$23.2B.4B
2C3B15.4B2.8B10.18B$22.2A6B2C3B16.14B2.2B2.20B$22.2AB.3B2D4B17.22BD
15B$23.B.4B2D4B13.2A3.21BDBD4B.7B$28.7B14.A4.20B3D4B2.6B$29.5B.A13.A.
AB.22BD4B3.6B$27.4B3.A.A13.2A28B6.4B$27.2A6.2A14.17B.4B12.B2A2B$28.A
24.19B14.2A.B2A$25.3A16.A10.16B18.BA.A$25.A18.3A8.15B22.A$47.A7.14B
23.2A$46.2A3.B3.13B$46.8B.12B$48.18B$48.17B$47.17B$45.18B$43.19B$43.
2BC15B$42.3BCBC4B.9B$43.2B3C4B2.7B$42.5BC4B4.5B$41.10B3.5B$40.4B10.2A
$39.4B12.A$38.4B10.3A$37.B2AB11.A$36.3BA$35.B3A$34.2BAB$33.4B$32.4B!
#C [[ AUTOSTART STEP 4 ZOOM 3 ]]
Not quite Spartan, so therefore probably not quite useful -- unless somebody can locate a better H-to-G0, of course. (CatForce?) Spartan H-to-G0s are easy to string together, but they're too big and awkward and slow to be worth dealing with.
simsim314 wrote:dvgrn wrote:Eventually I'm plotting to use the orientations from the last post, and the timing of the outputs, to come up with a unique short name for each conduit.
I don't like the bulky conduits that use rectifier, so I would place them in separate place, probably as supplementaries to the main basic conduits.
Makes sense, and I agree. I've left the questionable rectifier-assisted conduits in yellow for now; maybe I or someone will move them somewhere else eventually.
We should probably still generate a standardized name for all of these bulky conduits, though, and make a big list to go with a labeled stamp collection. Seems to me a text search for a name will turn up duplicate or near-duplicate conduits much more reliably than manual inspection of a big pile of conduits in a pattern -- with or without supplementary stamp collections...!